B

E

F

O

R

E

T

H

E

Y

P

A

S

S

Photographer Criticized by Indigenous People and Survival International

From the Editors of the Guardian

K

A

Z

H

K

A

G

O

R

O

K

O

the tribe's opinion

"What Jimmy Nelson says about us is not true. My people, the Dani people, were never headhunters, it was never our tradition. The real headhunters are the Indonesian military who have been killing my people. My people are still strong and we fight for our freedom. We are not 'passing away', we are being killed by the brutal Indonesian soldiers. That is the truth."

"I saw the photos and I didn't like them. This man only wants to force his own ideas on the photos, to publish them in books and to show them to everyone so that people will think he's a great photographer. Just like Chagnon, he does whatever he wants with indigenous peoples. It is not true that indigenous peoples are about to die out. We will be around for a long time, fighting for our land, living in this world and continuing to create our children."
"As a tribal person I feel offended by Jimmy Nelson's work 'Before They Pass Away'. It's outrageous! We are not passing away but struggling to survive. Industrialized society is trying to destroy us in the name of 'progress', but we will keep defending our lands and contributing to the protection of the planet."

"As a Maori man, I can go ahead and say the lack of research on this photographers part is straight up offensive."

A

S

A

R

O

M

U

S

T

A

N

G

The coffee-table portraits, which sell for up to $65,000 each, are visually stunning, unashamedly glamorous and have been seen in many of the world's glossy magazines and leading galleries. But British photographer Jimmy Nelson's stylized pictures of African, Asian and Amazon Indian groups have been roundly dismissed as "wrong" by community leaders as well as being called "false and damaging" by the world's leading defender of indigenous peoples. According to Stephen Corry, director of Survival International, the pictures are more akin to high fashion than reality and claims that it's the 'irreplaceable ethnographic record of a fast disappearing world' is wrong-from pretty much every angle. Corry adds that some of the pictures are "just a photographer's fantasy, bearing little relationship either to how these people appear now, or how they've ever appeared. Of course, rendering people more exotic than they really are is a timeworn tradition." The images look like a throwback to a past era, but they're also a contemporary invention. His Waorani (the Waorani Indians of Ecuador) female models have now preserved their modesty by tying "fig" leaves into their waist string, which they would never have done formerly. Corry also criticises the book's description of the Dani of West Papua as a dreaded head-hunting tribe, without mentioning accusations of killings, torture and intimidation under Indonesian occupation.

Indigenous leaders also weighed in to the debate, saying that Nelson's pictures reflected neither political nor historical reality. "I saw the photos and I didn't like them," said Brazilian Yanomami spiritual leader Davi Kopenawa. "This man only wants to force his own ideas on the photos, to publish them in books and to show them to everyone so that people will think he's a great photographer. He does whatever he wants with indigenous peoples. It is not true that indigenous peoples are about to die out. We will be around for a long time, fighting for our land, living in this world and continuing to create our children." Papuan tribal leader Benny Wenda said "What Jimmy Nelson says about us is not true. My people, the Dani people, were never headhunters, it was never our tradition. The real headhunters are the Indonesian military who have been killing my people. My people are still strong and we fight for our freedom. We are not passing away, we are being killed by the brutal Indonesian soldiers. That is the truth." Nixiwaka Yawanawa from Acre state in Brazil protested outside Nelson's exhibition in London. "As a tribal person I feel offended by Jimmy Nelson's work Before They Pass Away. It's outrageous! We are not passing away but struggling to survive. Industrialized societies are trying to destroy us in the name of progress, but we will keep defending our lands and contributing to the protection of the planet," he said. Nelson responded, saying his pictures of Kazakh, Himba, Huli, Kalam, Goroka, Maori and other peoples

variety and importance of what is left of indigenous culture. Yes, it's idealistic. Indigenous peoples are usually portrayed (by groups like Survival) as impoverished. But they have a wealth and a pride. It's not only about material possessions. I shoot from a very personal, aesthetic point of view. Dierent people can interpret what they like." He said his portraits echo pictures of a model such as Kate Moss. Unembarrassed by the stratospheric price his photographs can command, Nelson said he is open about not paying the tribal groups even though they are acting as his models. "No money changes hands. You oer food, a ritual party with a goat or a cow. I spend a lot of time ingratiating myself. It's narcissism. It's playing on their vanity," he says. "In coming years I will go back with a film crew to these communities and ask them if I was right. We will talk about perceptions of wealth. "The only negative reaction has come from Survival International. I think they have a hidden agenda, but I will not say more. It's a pity. We are both trying to save the same thing."

B

A

N

N

A

H

A

M

A

R

the critics opinion

"The criminal, often genocidal, treatment of many tribal peoples remains underpinned by a portrayal eliciting from us little more than wistful pangs of history lost. Nothing wrong with nostalgia of course, but there's a lot wrong with presenting crimes against humanity as just another historical inevitability, as natural and unstoppable as Canute's rising tide."

"There is a fashion for photographers to visit tribal peoples around the world and I do think it is important that they portray them accurately and highlight the problems they face and not ignore them. Coincidentally we have been asked whether we would consider hosting an exhibiton of Nelson's pictures – which of course we will not."
"The tribes in Nelson's book face constant threats of displacement, murder, racism, or forced "development", yet the average viewer would have no inkling of the suffering behind every dramatic print. Exposure to the western world is a rare chance for them to hold oppressive governments accountable. Instead, Nelson has selected picturesque elements from each place, added a pinch of untruths, removed political and social context and painted their deliberate and preventable destruction as effectively a fait accompli."

"It's the idea of the noble savage that goes back hundreds of years—that somewhere out there are people who are untainted by a corrupting technological civilization. And Nelson has gone out and found them, and he's staged these elaborate production shots, which in their technical perfection are gorgeous. But what he's giving people, viewers in an affluent Western audience, is a fantasy. It's a fantasy that to me says more about the people who are consumers of these images than the people who are the ostensible subjects."
"If this way of life is disappearing, then why is it disappearing? And what does it have to do with us, as observers? It turns out that it has a lot to do with us. But we don’t see that in the images."